Insights NZ

How employers can avoid costly penalties and adverse employee awards - Legalwise Seminars

Written by Marketing Support | Mar 21, 2019 9:42:18 AM
 

Buddle Findlay Partner Susan Rowe and Senior Associate Shaun Brookes discuss recent eye-catching media headlines which suggest employees have received generous payments for minimal or questionable work. But headlines can be deceiving, they warn. After exploring several cases, Susan and Shaun suggest what employers can do to avoid such penalties and adverse employee awards. 

Recent media reporting would have you believe employees are receiving windfall payments for minimal and questionable work. Headlines can be deceiving.

Consider for a moment – “Construction company to pay $17,000 to builder with a drinking problem”.

Few people would read such a headline and consider a boozy builder to be deserving of a $17,000 payday. Another recent headline also raises an eyebrow: “Café worker awarded $9,000 for a day’s work”.

Do café workers really earn that much? How can such high awards be justified? In these instances (and others) the answer lies with the actions or inaction of the employer, rather than the conduct of the employee. The Employment Relations Authority (the Authority), which investigates and determines employment relationship problems, found the employers in both of the above cases to have fallen short of the legal minimum standards required from New Zealand employers.

The awards referred to by the media include lost wages and payments for hurt and humiliation, but also in the case of the builder, include significant penalties for breaching minimum employment standards. In New Zealand, these employment standards ensure that all employees enjoy rights, including paid time off when they are sick, paid holidays, access to their employment records, minimum rates of pay, and freedom from exploitation. For the most part, these minimum standards cannot be contracted out of; they must be given to every employee.

While the builder had an alcohol problem and a gambling addiction, he was still entitled to an employment agreement.  He was also entitled to minimum periods of paid annual leave, and time and a half plus a day in lieu when he worked on a public holiday. The Authority found that his employer had refused him these minimum rights (May v Solidbuilt Construction 2017 Limited [2019] NZERA 54).

The café worker only worked for one day, but she was employed to work and was not paid anything. She was not told by the café that she would not be paid until after she had finished the day’s work. The Authority determined the café worker was an employee and she was entitled to wages. If her employment ended she was entitled to notice of her termination, or a payment in lieu of notice. The Authority found that the café worker suffered distress as a result of her employer’s actions, and awarded $7,000 as compensation for hurt and humiliation (Mawhinney v Sfizio Limited [2019] NZERA 49).

While a $7,000 hurt and humiliation payment might have previously been an average payment, the Chief Judge of the Employment Court released guidance on banding in 2018. An award of $7,000 is now considered a “low band” award. Average hurt and humiliation awards are likely to be much higher in 2019.

What can employers do to avoid such penalties and adverse employee awards?

1. Have an employment agreement

Having a written and signed employment agreement is a legal requirement. In both of the cases discussed above, a written employment agreement would have gone a long way towards preventing the problems that eventuated. It is not too late. If you have employees that you know have never been given an employment agreement, meet with them and remedy the situation now. Having an agreement in place, albeit belatedly, is far better than having no agreement.

2. Keep wage, time and leave records

This is a legal requirement of all employers for each employee.

3. Consult with your employees before making decisions that will affect their employment

Employers and employees have reciprocal duties of good faith, which include the requirement to be open and communicative with each other. Adhering to this duty will (for the most part) resolve potential employment problems.

4. If in doubt, seek professional advice.


Partner Susan Rowe specialises in litigation, local government, insurance, industrial relations and health and safety. Susan currently advises clients on litigation issues arising out of the Canterbury rebuild.  She acts for both insureds and insurers on disputed claims. Susan acts for Southern Response Earthquake Services Limited and previously advised the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority. She represents a range of local authorities on local government matters, including decision-making, governance, conflicts of interest, bylaws, judicial review and requests for official information and personal information. Susan advises a range of public sector and private clients on employment and health and safety issues.  She appears for clients in the Employment Relations Authority, the Employment Court, the High Court, appellate courts and in the Coroners Court. Susan is a Member of the New Zealand Society of Construction Law and NZILA, and Convenor of a New Zealand Law Society General Standards Committee. Contact Susan at susan.rowe@buddlefindlay.comor connect via LinkedIn 


Senior Associate Shaun Brookes specialises in employment law, industrial relations, and health and safety, as well as dispute resolution and general litigation. He advises clients on a wide range of employment matters, including terminations, bullying, redundancy and restructuring, Holiday Act entitlements, and industrial relations.  He regularly provides training and seminars on health and safety, employment, and privacy topics. Shaun also represents a number of councils on regulatory enforcement and prosecutions.  He advises clients on health and safety matters and has experience with WorkSafe investigations and prosecutions. He is an experienced litigator and appears in the Employment Relations Authority and Employment Court, the District Court and High Court, and at mediation on behalf of clients. Shaun is also a Pegasus Scholarship recipient and was previously a Captain in the New Zealand Army territorial force. Contact Shaun at shaun.brookes@buddlefindlay.com or connect via LinkedIn